From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: bug#25061: consider adding %COMPAT to default gnutls priority string
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:05:14 +0300
Message-ID: <83k210mr8l.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87zikiwpl6.fsf@igalia.com> <878trzo5ys.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<87fum7o0qu.fsf@gnu.org> <87zikfmiiy.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<878tq0dqgw.fsf@gnus.org> <87sho1gemz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87vasigi2c.fsf@igalia.com> <871sv2krfc.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<8360d1yzvj.fsf@gnu.org> <877exbhbc5.fsf@lifelogs.com>
	<87k21bj7sb.fsf@detlef> <87y3phgf3a.fsf@lifelogs.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505455575 5483 195.159.176.226 (15 Sep 2017 06:06:15 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:06:15 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: wingo@igalia.com, 25061@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org,
	michael.albinus@gmx.de, larsi@gnus.org
To: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 15 08:06:08 2017
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1dsjlQ-0001DR-Js
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:06:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51481 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1dsjlW-00026K-3G
	for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:06:14 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55585)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dsjlO-00025r-1W
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:06:09 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dsjlK-0003RF-Fc
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:06:05 -0400
Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33106)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dsjlK-0003R5-Br
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:06:02 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dsjlK-00042O-1I
	for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:06:02 -0400
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:06:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.25061.B25061.150545555315506@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25061
X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
Original-Received: via spool by 25061-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25061.150545555315506
	(code B ref 25061); Fri, 15 Sep 2017 06:06:01 +0000
Original-Received: (at 25061) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2017 06:05:53 +0000
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41787 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dsjl7-00041w-UR
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:05:53 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36319)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1dsjl2-00041Y-N9
	for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:05:48 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1dsjkt-0003Gf-Rf
	for 25061@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:05:39 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41014)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1dsjkU-0002yc-4s; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:05:10 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2453
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1dsjkT-00065H-Jq; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 02:05:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <87y3phgf3a.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Thu, 
	14 Sep 2017 17:11:53 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnu-emacs/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs"
	<bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136987
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs/136987>

> From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,  wingo@igalia.com,  25061@debbugs.gnu.org,  ludo@gnu.org,  larsi@gnus.org
> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 17:11:53 -0400
> 
> On Thu, 07 Sep 2017 09:18:44 +0200 Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> wrote: 
> 
> MA> Connection-local variables have landed in Emacs last November, reworked
> MA> in February. What do you miss?
> 
> Sadly, time.

No worries, there's still plenty of time before 26.1 will be close to
release.  I hope you will find time until then to take care of this
issue.

Thanks.