From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs port to gcc -fcheck-pointer-bounds Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:33:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83k1xwuwq3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83indhwcx5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512808434 28491 195.159.176.226 (9 Dec 2017 08:33:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 08:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 09:33:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNaZv-0007E5-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 09:33:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40386 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNaa3-0004zE-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:33:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNaZv-0004z6-Bh for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:33:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNaZq-0006Ot-Sf for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNaZq-0006Oo-PS; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:33:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4223 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eNaZp-0000BK-V8; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:33:42 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Paul Eggert on Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:06:25 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220809 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:06:25 -0800 > Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, Emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 12/08/2017 05:45 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > It's a large patch, so I think the discussion could benefit from an > > overview of the main points of the implementation. > > > > In particular, how would this work in a build --with-wide-int? > > The short answer is, "It doesn't" I suspected that much. Too bad, but not a catastrophe. What about the more general question I asked: can you say a few words about the idea of your implementation of the support for "-fcheck-pointer-bounds"?