From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Branch freezing for release Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 21:31:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83k1g167a9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871s3jeh8m.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87zhq4zzcz.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <871s3a90qo.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87imvmbube.fsf@gmail.com> <87mukyiczg.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <877ec2iau1.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <4CAA6D9F-0402-489C-8DD1-CE2ADBAA42C9@gnu.org> <87tvf69r16.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <4C62647A-5A71-4C82-9D37-ED933023AFC0@gnu.org> <83pnpt6cf9.fsf@gnu.org> <87pnpt4x0d.fsf@tcd.ie> <83mukx6ayb.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhoxzrn7.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="81663"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: eric@ericabrahamsen.net, npostavs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 20:33:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hEI1y-000L5z-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:33:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35703 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEI1x-00054S-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:33:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40383) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEI11-00052X-3g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:32:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38667) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hEI0z-0008Bz-WD; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:32:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1256 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hEI0w-0000UU-Fy; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:32:05 -0400 In-reply-to: <87zhoxzrn7.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:235237 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Cc: , , > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:39:24 +0100 > > >> [1: 10cd65878c]: Update documentation for indent-relative functions > >> 2019-04-05 19:48:21 -0500 > >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=10cd65878c741d2a22a1f2c36c54fcad4e516f72 > >> > >> [2: 0e468a6204]: Avoid using obsolete indent-relative-maybe > >> 2019-04-03 17:55:40 +0100 > >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=0e468a620458fecd003c396050aa6deb722982c1 > >> > >> [3: 690c678fb6]: Fix comment-empty-lines docstring (bug#35152) > >> 2019-04-04 23:41:02 +0100 > >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=690c678fb6c1fb5b2f828f9bb90782bd0b01c399 > >> > >> N.B.: Commit [2] also includes small code changes, not just docfixes. > > > > I hope you now know the answer; if not, please ask for clarifications. > > My understanding is that commits [1] and [3] above are automatically > safe and I may backport them, and that backporting commit [2] is > unlikely to receive your blessing. Yes, correct. > But I would like to ask for it nonetheless, since commit [2] is an > obvious fix™ for a regression in 26.1: > > [4: a9973a3c16]: Extend 'indent-relative' when its arg is non-nil > 2016-11-18 11:02:55 +0200 > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git/commit/?id=a9973a3c164060bde08a717b46023a3bf68909c8 The regression doesn't look serious enough to warrant a change at this late stage. We can talk about it again after Emacs 26.2 is out. Thanks.