From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35241: 27.0.50; Tramp can't decrypt .authinfo.gpg in Win 10 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:47:42 +0300 Message-ID: <83k1fugg6p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <875zrezqxm.fsf@gmail.com> <15457.9284878977$1555390524@news.gmane.org> <87sgui5sf6.fsf@gmx.de> <87pnpm3yhr.fsf@gmx.de> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="224021"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: shuguang79@qq.com, 35241@debbugs.gnu.org, npostavs@gmail.com To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 16 16:48:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNb-000w90-HI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:48:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNa-0005mo-Hp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:48:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNT-0005mK-Ot for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNS-0007aL-Tv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNS-0007a1-NK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNS-0001w7-9w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35241 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35241-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35241.15554260777432 (code B ref 35241); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35241) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Apr 2019 14:47:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNN-0001vn-2k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:47:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45464) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNJ-0001vX-KQ for 35241@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:47:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPNE-0007V0-7B; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1313 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hGPND-0002f2-IJ; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:47:48 -0400 In-reply-to: <87pnpm3yhr.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:50:40 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157718 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:50:40 +0200 > Cc: 35241@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky > > Relative file names are not forbidden as part of exec-path. Shall we ban > them (with an error message)? Or shall we ignore them, silently? Don't know. > > I'd vote for the latter (including proper documentation). Maybe executable-find should ignore them if default-directory is remote?