From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35725: 26.2; Fatal error 11: Segmentation fault; Crash on: (find-file "any.svg") Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 18:25:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83k1et9hxt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zhnq567e.wl-pegzmasta@member.fsf.org> <87sgthg7i8.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="172928"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: pegzmasta@member.fsf.org, 35725@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 17:27:09 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZKf-000itb-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 17:27:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49859 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZKe-0003vE-Hr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53943) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJc-0003I6-1F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJb-0002tQ-3N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:26:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36087) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJa-0002sJ-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:26:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJZ-0003eh-Rt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:26:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 15:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35725 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 35725-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35725.155784755614040 (code B ref 35725); Tue, 14 May 2019 15:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35725) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 May 2019 15:25:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49631 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJT-0003eO-Tl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39482) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJS-0003eB-HM for 35725@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:25:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37522) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJN-0002cQ-4X; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:25:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3275 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hQZJM-0007FA-5W; Tue, 14 May 2019 11:25:48 -0400 In-reply-to: <87sgthg7i8.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Noam Postavsky on Mon, 13 May 2019 21:16:47 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:159277 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 21:16:47 -0400 > Cc: 35725@debbugs.gnu.org > > I think this might be the same as Bug#29581; we closed that as being a > bug in some version of ImageMagick, but it's occurring to me that since > the backtrace ends in emacs, perhaps it is actually an Emacs bug after > all. What ends in Emacs is that our fatal signal handler is called, and tries to handle the segfault. But the segfault itself is clearly inside ImageMagick, not in Emacs code. Which still might mean we somehow cause it, but I think we will need an ImageMagick expert, or at least someone who will step through ImageMagick code, to tell us what exactly is wrong, and why.