From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Crashes in "C-h h"
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2019 05:34:59 +0300
Message-ID: <83k1cybk8c.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <83y31hes6r.fsf@gnu.org> <mvm1rz9pzn7.fsf@suse.de>
 <83r279epwe.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAOqdjBfAfLuAUj67LnFx-4tD2g0tUUuA-_Le6scQPWJeD2eo2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <09f72051-d740-9115-c6fd-c4344c749568@cs.ucla.edu> <83muhvd9nm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <9b78b85d-a3c8-761f-e500-d51d4a985fa8@cs.ucla.edu>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="185636"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 04 04:35:42 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hirb3-000mCh-F5
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Jul 2019 04:35:41 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42464 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hirb2-00030j-Fp
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:35:40 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48697)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1hiraZ-0002yX-Pk
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:35:12 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50501)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hiraY-0004oG-Gd; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:35:10 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3317 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hiraX-0004UT-VS; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 22:35:10 -0400
In-reply-to: <9b78b85d-a3c8-761f-e500-d51d4a985fa8@cs.ucla.edu> (message from
 Paul Eggert on Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:05:32 -0700)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:238345
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/238345>

> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Cc: pipcet@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 14:05:32 -0700
> 
> 1031-lnxsrv09 $ time ./a.out 0 0   # no operation
> 
> real	0m28.150s
> user	0m28.148s
> sys	0m0.001s
> 1032-lnxsrv09 $ time ./a.out 0 0 0   # FIXNUMP+XFIXNUM
> 
> real	0m34.229s
> user	0m34.227s
> sys	0m0.001s
> 1033-lnxsrv09 $ time ./a.out 0 0 0 0    # EQ+make_fixnum
> 
> real	0m32.213s
> user	0m32.211s
> sys	0m0.001s
> 
> which indicates that the EQ+make_fixnum version was about 50% faster 
> than the FIXNUMP+XFIXNUM version, once you subtract the overhead of the 
> no-op benchmark control.

Is this with USE_LSB or without?  I think we need to time both
variants.