From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve Malayalam language transliteration Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 18:07:43 +0300 Message-ID: <83k0z3lcqo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87d07ul5m1.fsf@gmx.net> <83r1wa5k1w.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv161aml.fsf@gmx.net> <83eesa5fxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhaxk5tw.fsf@gmx.net> <83wo4wq81f.fsf@gnu.org> <87365t9dwp.fsf@Kittu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83tuy8lulp.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9io9ll1.fsf@Kittu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <878sfkf32w.fsf@Kittu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87lfjkau9a.fsf@Kittu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15525"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: James Thomas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 16 17:09:17 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jw5Vc-0003wf-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:09:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44082 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jw5Vb-0002Gf-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:09:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jw5UP-0000Wt-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:49596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jw5UN-0006Fv-JX; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:08:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1523 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jw5UK-0008Pf-Tm; Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:07:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lfjkau9a.fsf@Kittu.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (message from James Thomas on Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:14:49 +0530) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:252981 Archived-At: > From: James Thomas > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 11:14:49 +0530 > > James Thomas writes: > > > So for runtime it seems either better or unchanged. > > Oops, and for memory... > > Before > (2239385 650 4085383 17010 1612853 4995 86735) > After > (2239363 650 4085384 17010 1612901 4995 86738) > > (2239385-2239363)*16+(4085383-4085384)*16+(1612853-1612901)*1+(86735-86738)*32 > =192 bytes saved. Thanks, the differences are insignificant, IMO, and I personally prefer the current code which uses lists. Does someone think that switching to strings will be better?