From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44273: "total used in directory 19 available 5.2 GiB" Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0vacqea.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sg9zgchl.5.fsf@jidanni.org> <9FFBEBAF-FBB3-4AC9-950E-70B3927032F9@acm.org> <87h7qevdfc.fsf@gnus.org> <7B559E59-D3CA-4515-B17C-336029B7FBFA@acm.org> <877dravck1.fsf@gnus.org> <83DA3F8B-E525-43F6-8A72-A5AF6C0EEA38@acm.org> <87pn52tx05.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7qe1sjm.fsf@igel.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10458"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, larsi@gnus.org, jidanni@jidanni.org, 44273@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 28 16:39:26 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnXq-0002b0-T1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 16:39:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55294 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnXp-00062B-K0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50282) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnXS-0005zE-7z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnXR-0000r9-U8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnXR-00032j-Rp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44273 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix patch Original-Received: via spool by 44273-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44273.160389949711635 (code B ref 44273); Wed, 28 Oct 2020 15:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44273) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Oct 2020 15:38:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50193 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnWj-00031b-H5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:38:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnWi-00031M-2V for 44273@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnWb-0000jm-90; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:38:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4134 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kXnWa-0000p1-8V; Wed, 28 Oct 2020 11:38:08 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h7qe1sjm.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:47:09 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191889 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:47:09 +0100 > Cc: Mattias Engdegård , > 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson , > 44273@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Okt 28 2020, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > > True. If `ls-lisp' (or something similar) isn't fast enough, then it > > should be pretty easy to add a C-level function for efficient directory > > reading. > > That would require re-implementing each and every ls implementation, to > handle all possible command line arguments. Wouldn't it be enough to implement only what GNU 'ls' does? If some users will be unhappy with that and will want something their native 'ls' does, they can always go back to the old behavior (which we will need to leave in any case for backward compatibility).