From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#51210: Customizable other-window-for-scrolling Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:45:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83k0ekc6ty.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878ryvh6bz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <861r1v1foe.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <96d50c26-ea56-5ff6-3cc3-25652d744ca4@gmx.at> <86o84revzi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86y23vo0zx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86sftunptq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86a6g2ktel.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <86mtk2jdwy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czky6noe.fsf@gnu.org> <86r19crftb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8335ls69cy.fsf@gnu.org> <86y23kpwlf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83zgo04trm.fsf@gnu.org> <86zgo0ohci.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83tue84rgs.fsf@gnu.org> <86pmoqycnf.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83tue2wnhq.fsf@gnu.org> <86tudsx6nc.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8335lckj1b.fsf@gnu.org> <86tudp6pr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23174"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 51210@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 28 15:25:22 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nDSBm-0005os-IA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:25:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50986 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDSBl-0001S0-IY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 09:25:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54890) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRab-000366-Nz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:47:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36588) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRZi-0005Oa-CC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:46:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRZi-0003Cv-B3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 51210 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 51210-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B51210.164337752612264 (code B ref 51210); Fri, 28 Jan 2022 13:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 51210) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jan 2022 13:45:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57723 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRZ8-0003Bk-3n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:45:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53982) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRZ5-0003BS-In for 51210@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:45:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=52658 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRYz-0005CV-1n; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:45:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=IUzVLKjw8mvlfYCjxGcdbNMlan27rbpvGPibCKz7ikw=; b=ePkmNNN6vK4n edBviVmygEg1N3vQYk7eobP6j8zkCBb6U1Uq5fjN3OwGZYVA5grEV/wfeWLzeOvcnPlbYLEbIialC fkRXI4ZhYAmjN0nDjAi4VxPGCZKNSiZwKKv7psMLygufhqy/rInGaXNaDXLmW5bxiFxoTuldE6gKa cwnWKpEfbG+UI1i77qarFkbpqhicQ/EpNh2PRIO22raGgW2WgAF45CKpStUqRjwRMlNKm7zu3X7m7 J/0GbZHKCBVMy8lgtDDsiZuMqFcRFKYy9z3rb6hXZyo4WXefCF7qO9qOrFgZaFvfp1eVfXszwFlei VjvM1kLJvCKcdDUZskdV7g==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3993 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDRYy-000213-In; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 08:45:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86tudp6pr0.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:40:51 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:225450 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, 51210@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2022 19:40:51 +0200 > > > It isn't beginning of buffer, it's where (beginning-of-buffer arg) > > puts point when ARG is non-nil. See the doc string of > > beginning-of-buffer. > > Sorry, I didn't notice it takes an argument. Then it's strange > that it doesnt't recenter according to recenter-top-bottom that > uses recenter-positions. So two most useful behaviors > (recenter-top-bottom for beginning-of-buffer-other-window and > no recentering for end-of-buffer-other-window) are not supported. > Since the default can't be changed, maybe a new optional argument > could define whether to use recenter-top-bottom, or no recenter at all. I don't mind having a new option, but is recenter-positions really relevant to beginning-of-buffer-other-window? why would users want to have beginning-of-buffer-other-window recenter in non-default ways, just because they customized recenter-positions?