From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59802: 30.0.50; Checkbox button not rendered Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 14:49:35 +0200 Message-ID: <83k02vpixs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v8mshit6.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <838rjoendw.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0xgh7c3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83zgc4crg6.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilisgxbi.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83lenocoge.fsf@gnu.org> <87edtggol3.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83359vd535.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz8s3gq7.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83sfhozreh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilik8zjs.fsf@gmx.net> <83v8mjweqm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6y3447l.fsf@gmx.net> <83cz8rw5pq.fsf@gnu.org> <874ju2qe3a.fsf@gmx.net> <83k02yszqf.fsf@gnu.org> <87k02wd0hl.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83lencr08t.fsf@gnu.org> <87fsdjd5g4.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6341"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, 59802@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 13 13:50:17 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p54jh-0001SO-JQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:50:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p54jU-00081P-GS; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p54jS-00080y-MZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p54jS-0001fU-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p54jS-00070Q-03 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59802 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59802-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59802.167093577826917 (code B ref 59802); Tue, 13 Dec 2022 12:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59802) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Dec 2022 12:49:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60139 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p54j3-000705-Od for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:42660) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1p54j2-0006zz-NH for 59802@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:49:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p54iw-0001by-TY; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:49:30 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=m+JETSw2IaaG9EAewg6hZz7XTVwJ012PUrTWqE9R2tM=; b=Qh0x+UzJfTOl x0cfTFouLgcxFY1vmhPUZXDMC7vtrn1cyQf6ekEBEVVyQJVZCDjdHZwiQyobLggmldH3kRHdTW6zi djJHPkgV5Fw7GaHW5kxRi/4DRGKyvRXiwwVJ1JDlmTyJZNxACH9jNGJ0tLflW12Wwa/e3HTjOda6A pJnkBKYcQabWRp+VdaGrjkZVhX3d+QQjMAXysokFm3A/OfdiKPIL+YsIp5B2eAAwi1/xuRuXSzLoM 8HIJGTPsJu1Ow880mgWl8/HYz+BM1234bIffNCOZ3k11RyWgK7CRkGXCTImdeGKqHl9AiXHQwUTGq j7S8uHYDH66Zjk21SPuPdg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p54iw-00082r-B9; Tue, 13 Dec 2022 07:49:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87fsdjd5g4.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:21:47 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:250828 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, 59802@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 10:21:47 +0100 > > This new patch calculate the unknown percentage dimension with the other > known dimension. It should work the same on our examples (maybe Stephen > you could check that). I'm not sure I understand the reason for "else if". Isn't possible that both conditions could be true? If so, why not use both dimensions in that case, instead of arbitrarily preferring one of them? Which of the 3 possible branches get executed in the recipe of this bug? IOW, which dimension was unknown?