From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7001: should `byte-compile-from-buffer' evaluate `binary-overwrite-mode' explicitly? Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 06:04:46 +0200 Message-ID: <83iq1jq5up.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bp7cjilq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286079861 21061 80.91.229.12 (3 Oct 2010 04:24:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 04:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7001@debbugs.gnu.org, monkey@sandpframing.com To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 03 06:24:19 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2G7X-0004MB-0f for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 06:24:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56819 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P2G7W-0003yH-BW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49207 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P2G6M-0003Os-DS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P2FvD-000614-LW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55082) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P2FvD-000610-I9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2Fly-0002Xn-1m; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 04:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7001 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7001-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7001.12860785039772 (code B ref 7001); Sun, 03 Oct 2010 04:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7001) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Oct 2010 04:01:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2Fle-0002XZ-Hv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:01:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P2Flb-0002XU-W2 for 7001@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:01:41 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9P00H004JVHW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 7001@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 06:04:41 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.77.74]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9P00H6N4NRGQ20@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 03 Oct 2010 06:04:41 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87bp7cjilq.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:02:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40662 Archived-At: > From: Chong Yidong > Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:11:13 -0400 > Cc: 7001@debbugs.gnu.org, MON KEY > > > Most likely this line can be removed from bytecomp.el. > > The comments in bytecomp.el say this is needed for DOS. That comment is obsolete. All file I/O works in binary mode on DOS and Windows since at least 15 years ago.