From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is intellisense features integration in Emacs technically possible? Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:56:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83iotcf1t4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1390269670.2888.14.camel@localhost.localdomain> <83vbxcfzaa.fsf@gnu.org> <87eh40fx9j.fsf@wanadoo.es> <42135829.UacbDn8H0U@descartes> <87a9eofd23.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390406165 4688 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2014 15:56:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 16:56:10 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W609w-0002iQ-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:56:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35877 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W609v-0006lj-MJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42188) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W609o-0006l7-RY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W609j-0005Td-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:56:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:49628) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W609j-0005TV-65 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:55:55 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZT001007ZX8W00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:55:17 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZT00GQE885D6B0@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:55:17 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87a9eofd23.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168898 Archived-At: > From: =C3=93scar Fuentes > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:53:08 +0100 >=20 > R=C3=BCdiger Sonderfeld writes: >=20 > > Why would we have to write a C++ parser and semantic analyzer? >=20 > If I understood Eli correctly he is advocating the independence of = Emacs > for that purposes. Indeed; but so does R=C3=BCdiger. > > There is one in CEDET, there is one in GCC, there is one in libcl= ang, > > and there is one in the KDevelop libraries. >=20 > CEDET is in line with Eli's views, while the other options we shoul= d > avoid (*) (Except, perhaps, GCC.) >=20 > OTOH CEDET's internal capabilities for C++ are very limited last ti= me I > checked. It is more about "C with classes" with some crude hacks fo= r > templates. It does not real C++ semantic analysis. >=20 > * Again, unless I misunderstood him. You didn't. My point is that we already have a lot of infrastructure in CEDET tha= t can (and IMO should) be leveraged towards these goals.