From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16594: 24.3.50; very slow redraw when resizing windows horizontally Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:27:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83iot177ug.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52EA57F6.70808@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391099292 7374 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2014 16:28:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16594@debbugs.gnu.org, darren.hoo@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 30 17:28:18 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uTQ-0003j7-Ae for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 17:28:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51099 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uTP-000065-TY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:28:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uTH-00005n-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:28:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uTC-0004r5-QX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:28:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uTC-0004r0-NC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uTC-0007dN-BW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16594 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16594-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16594.139109927529332 (code B ref 16594); Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16594) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jan 2014 16:27:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41625 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uT4-0007d1-4N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:27:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:44886) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W8uT0-0007cr-NJ for 16594@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:27:52 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N0800C002QMSE00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 16594@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:26:54 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N080079330U6H70@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Thu, 30 Jan 2014 18:26:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84269 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:44:21 -0500 > Cc: 16594@debbugs.gnu.org, Darren Hoo > > Darren's complaint seems to point at each redisplay being slow > rather than redisplay happening too many times. I see nothing in the original report that would suggest that redisplay is slow. Quite the contrary, it takes a minuscule fraction of the total time. Anyway, the "fix" actually makes things worse, so I think you can have your wish back soon enough.