From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:41:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83ioic9zk6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <546B7F11.2050306@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416332504 8667 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 17:41:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, kwhite@gnu.org, stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 18:41:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqmmW-0006bo-BX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:41:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54546 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqmmV-0001nY-Nj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:41:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40758) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqmmM-0001ci-0v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:41:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqmmH-0004bg-0B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:41:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout24.012.net.il ([80.179.55.180]:33143) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqmmG-0004bG-Ln; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 12:41:20 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout24.012.net.il by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF800F00WPHAD00@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:33:43 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout24.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF80095RWS6Z250@mtaout24.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:33:43 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <546B7F11.2050306@dancol.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.180 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177608 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:17:05 -0800 > From: Daniel Colascione > Cc: Kelvin White , > Stephen Leake , > Emacs development discussions > > >> Stefan requested that I didn't push this to the public repository, but > >> I'm not going to finish it tonight, and I need some feedback. > >> > >> So I did anyway. > > > > Isn't that somewhat impolite? (And precedent-setting?) > > Pushing to a development branch is somewhat less rude than pushing to emacs-24 proper, right? I can think of a few things that are even more rude than that. So?