From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:56:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83ioduty8z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <8361a029p2.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbi0zukw.fsf@gnu.org> <55080104.9070606@gmx.at> <5508800E.3070600@gmx.at> <55092AE0.1080206@gmx.at> <5509CC67.5010207@gmx.at> <550A7FFB.7040502@gmx.at> <550BD579.9040804@gmx.at> <550C3335.4070405@gmx.at> <83zj77vh87.fsf@gnu.org> <550C7AD1.4080806@gmx.at> <83egojv02r.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8z6vlyn.fsf@gnu.org> <550D4100.6030500@gmx.at> <83k2yatypj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426935426 18993 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2015 10:57:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, dancol@dancol.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 21 11:56:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YZH5J-0004Pn-4b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 11:56:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47408 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZH5I-0002I2-Df for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 06:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZH54-0002Hj-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 06:56:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZH53-0003ts-Eh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 06:56:38 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:38250) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YZH4x-0003sp-9w; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 06:56:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLK008005YJL100@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:55:05 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLK000W76BTAE70@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:55:05 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <83k2yatypj.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184086 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 12:46:32 +0200 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: dancol@dancol.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > No, I mean positions traversed while "this command" is executed. The > position shown to the user is the last one of those, but how do we > ensure that pre-redisplay-function is never run for those? ^^^^^^^^^ "for others"