From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: VC mode and git Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:36:25 +0200 Message-ID: <83iodppx3a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86egoeusg2.fsf@example.com> <83pp7yp5po.fsf@gnu.org> <5511D489.9010007@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427254614 19518 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2015 03:36:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 03:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sva-news@mygooglest.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 25 04:36:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yac7Y-0002MT-Vg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:36:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35996 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yac7Y-0008Rv-83 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55355) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yac7U-0008Rm-A6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:36:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yac7P-0006Yi-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:36:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:60512) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yac7P-0006YC-3Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:36:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLR007000EF6R00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:19 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLR0076M0G76500@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 05:31:19 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <5511D489.9010007@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184194 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 23:18:01 +0200 > From: Dmitry Gutov > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > E.g., > > would it make sense for "C-x v v" to push when the previous action was > > commit and there are not uncommitted changes? > > After a prompt, maybe, like Chad suggested. But I don't know if we want > to make this too easy: after all, when ChangeLogs are auto-generated, it > might be better to somehow force the user to review the changes and > messages before pushing. Then perhaps after a commit "C-x v v" should do a "git show", and allow to push from the buffer that displays HEAD?