From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20389: A way to communicate announcements to developers Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:50:45 +0300 Message-ID: <83ioco2gsq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wq154f2f.fsf@gnu.org> <87618p8kh2.fsf@igel.home> <83tww949b4.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429725082 1103 80.91.229.3 (22 Apr 2015 17:51:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:51:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, 20389@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 22 19:51:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykynm-0002UW-Gr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 19:51:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36426 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykynl-0001sa-TK for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykynj-0001sT-7Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykyne-0003z3-J1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46970) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykyne-0003yz-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ykyne-0007UQ-3Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20389 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20389-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20389.142972505628775 (code B ref 20389); Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20389) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2015 17:50:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36746 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YkynX-0007U3-LQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:50:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:52866) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YkynV-0007Ti-5b for 20389@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NN700900YJCC400@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 20389@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:50:46 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NN7009IUYWL1G90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 20:50:46 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101884 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: Andreas Schwab , 20389@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:21:37 -0400 > > 1) Is that a system people are ok with using? It was just my suggestion. I guess we will see. > 2) If so, get it documented/advertised/used. It already is, see CONTRIBUTE.