From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20752: 24.3; Display of combining characters on OS X after 24.3 Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 05:36:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83iob0meha.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83pp58myvl.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2vgmx98.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1433644642 4066 80.91.229.3 (7 Jun 2015 02:37:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2015 02:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20752@debbugs.gnu.org To: Pavel Iosad Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 07 04:37:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QSU-0003JT-Rm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 04:37:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53246 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QST-0000vg-EN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:37:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QSQ-0000vb-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QSN-0006dh-7j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33652) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QSN-0006da-2q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QSM-0001hM-Mw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2015 02:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20752 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20752-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20752.14336446046503 (code B ref 20752); Sun, 07 Jun 2015 02:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20752) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2015 02:36:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43627 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QS4-0001gp-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:36:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:33931) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1QRz-0001gX-Aw for 20752@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Jun 2015 22:36:42 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NPJ00E00YY3EC00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 20752@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 05:38:38 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NPJ00ENWZCEJV10@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Sun, 07 Jun 2015 05:38:38 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:103685 Archived-At: > From: Pavel Iosad > Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 21:11:32 +0100 > > >> > Does "C-u C-x =" say that the base character and the diacritical are > >> > composed? > >> > >> Yes. > > > > But the composition data is different. Isn't that strange? Can you > > try figuring out why? > > I could try, but I'm not at all familiar with how this bit of Emacs is > supposed to work (sorry!), so I wouldn't know where to start -- is there > a particular thing I should try to look at? I meant mainly the way both versions were built -- perhaps different configuration options or different versions of some support libraries?