From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lax matching is not a great default behavior Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83io4hj76y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <837fl2qzs2.fsf@gnu.org> <83610ikvto.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb8iqa0l.fsf@udel.edu> <87k2oyymjv.fsf@udel.edu> <83r3j6j5vj.fsf@gnu.org> <83poyqj5qb.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh9djzb0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449063988 4985 80.91.229.3 (2 Dec 2015 13:46:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: bruce.connor.am@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 14:46:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a47jF-00063g-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 14:45:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58163 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a47jF-0008Ah-9r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:45:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a47is-0008Aa-GV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:45:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a47in-0002aj-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:45:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:52060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a47in-0002Zp-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 08:45:25 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NYQ00D00GLMRV00@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:43:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NYQ009DVGT8IP50@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 15:43:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195745 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:06:22 +0000 > From: Artur Malabarba > Cc: Mark Oteiza , emacs-devel > > Yes. lazy-highlight is definitely doing something wrong. If I can hit > C-s and instantly be told "no more matches", lazy-highlight shouldn't > be slow at all. > I just tested here and the same happens for me. Moreover, a yesterday's morning build doesn't seem to exhibit the problem, so it's something that was changed during the last 36 hours. 61a4b57, perhaps? Which now raises a doubt whether this is indeed what annoyed Mark, since I don't believe that impression was based on a single-day experience.