From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: reftex.el autoloads Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 05:42:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83io3xzqo3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h9jqo9a5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83wpsm9skk.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4d22c7f.fsf@russet.org.uk> <831tata1mg.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1udxaky.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83mvth6jsa.fsf@gnu.org> <87poycvrp7.fsf@russet.org.uk> <566B2BFC.1070802@cs.ucla.edu> <877fkj1q5j.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83si375x03.fsf@gnu.org> <8737v71oo0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83r3ir5vrb.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4czz7ul.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83oadv58fm.fsf@gnu.org> <87h9jmks0u.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87zixexam5.fsf@russet.org.uk> <0ltwnjbj6q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zixagvs4.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450323768 6783 80.91.229.3 (17 Dec 2015 03:42:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 03:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 17 04:42:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a9PSk-0000cL-Tj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 04:42:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50592 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9PSj-0002lI-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:42:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9PSg-0002kx-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:42:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9PSb-0005zh-Kx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:48953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9PSb-0005zd-Hq; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:42:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1302 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a9PSa-0005KH-Ho; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:42:32 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:15:28 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196414 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:15:28 -0500 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Phillip Lord wrote: > > > But I see no point in moving half, and will just do them all. > > So is everyone ok with this decision to ban versioned autoloads from > Emacs? They've been there for years, causing no problem IMO. They aren't a problem for me, but I don't have any strong opinions about this.