From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:31:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83io2wggh8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <83bn8tmnvq.fsf@gnu.org> <56928356.2000609@yandex.ru> <8360z1mkfc.fsf@gnu.org> <5696EE9D.2090708@yandex.ru> <838u3si22k.fsf@gnu.org> <5697C7A8.6060601@yandex.ru> <83wprcgjxk.fsf@gnu.org> <5697DA3B.3070706@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452796321 8223 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2016 18:32:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 19:31:54 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmgb-0006JW-MU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 19:31:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44133 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmgb-0002PM-5b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54991) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmgL-0002P2-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmgH-0006Lf-It for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmgH-0006La-Fv; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:33 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3615 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aJmgG-0006bt-QI; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 13:31:33 -0500 In-reply-to: <5697DA3B.3070706@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:26:19 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:198147 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:26:19 +0300 > > On 01/14/2016 08:17 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Not sure what you mean by "our progress". > > I've asked for the list of commands without equivalents in the previous > emails. Did I now answer that? > >> Anything else we need for completeness? > > > > I guess dired-do-query-replace-regexp is the other one (bound to 'Q' > > in Dired). > > Why not let the user call dired-do-search, and then press `r'? Because people who used to have 'Q' will want to press it and get what they are used to, I guess. IOW, I think we should avoid gratuitously breaking backward compatibility. Can we have faithful emulations of these commands' UI, bound to the same keys, just working differently under the hood?