From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Very happy with emacs-25 so far Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:23:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83io0h6rvd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83shzm70zv.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2kx7reo.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458491035 13315 80.91.229.3 (20 Mar 2016 16:23:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, bozhidar@batsov.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 20 17:23:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ahg8r-0001mw-OF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 17:23:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahg8r-0001eg-5V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:23:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35290) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahg8a-0001dm-1o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahg8W-000091-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:23:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59530) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ahg8V-00008w-TA; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:23:27 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1278 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ahg8V-0006BL-2Y; Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:23:27 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:34:19 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201945 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: John Wiegley , bozhidar@batsov.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 11:34:19 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What is the purpose of marking them as blocking the release if we > > don't really mean that? > > I think there can be disagreement about how blocking these blocking bugs > are. My point is that we should decide once which ones are blocking, and then stick by that decision.