From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 d0d9f55: Allow newlines inside cl function arglists Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 22:23:52 +0300 Message-ID: <83inyj9j1z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160509235343.17047.73943@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160509235343.759D0220128@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1463081398 19516 80.91.229.3 (12 May 2016 19:29:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 19:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ahyatt@gmail.com, arturmalabarba@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, acm@muc.de, larsi@gnus.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 21:29:53 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wIz-0001Gb-2F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 21:29:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wIy-0000mC-9h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wIs-0000iO-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wIm-0001mv-PB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:29:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50802) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wD7-0000UP-La; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:23:49 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3654 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b0wD0-0001ua-Mr; Thu, 12 May 2016 15:23:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Tue, 10 May 2016 18:47:08 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203811 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 18:47:08 -0700 > Cc: Andrew Hyatt , Artur Malabarba , > Dmitry Gutov , Alan Mackenzie , > Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen > > I'm wondering if you and some of other core devs would be willing to spend a > few days scanning through the blocking bugs list[1], to see which ones really > need to be fixed in the next month, and which can be deferred until later? We'd need clear criteria for nominating blocking bug reports. Could you publish what you think should be those criteria?