From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Latest master broken on Cocoa/NS Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 10:25:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83inw7747g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6094b884-c675-cc67-cdc8-c6810b26f97d@yandex.ru> <676ea8c5-848d-5646-0be4-537fd7c1a1c3@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468567665 15217 80.91.229.3 (15 Jul 2016 07:27:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 07:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 15 09:27:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxX9-0006BM-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:27:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58913 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxX8-0001Cp-Vl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:27:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxVV-00007h-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:25:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxVP-0002YZ-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57227) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxVP-0002YU-MI; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2769 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bNxVN-0006ST-Nk; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 03:25:50 -0400 In-reply-to: <676ea8c5-848d-5646-0be4-537fd7c1a1c3@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Antipov on Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:41:32 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205700 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Antipov > Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 09:41:32 +0300 > Cc: João Távora , > emacs-devel > > For others, this addresses the cases where tooltips are 'first-class' > frames in Emacs terms (--with-x-toolkit={no,lucid,motif}, MS Windows, > GTK[23] builds when 'x-gtk-use-system-tooltips' is nil). The goal was > to avoid tricky global variables and (hopefully) to reduce overall > complexity of the relevant code. What are the advantages of making tooltip frame "first-class" frames? IOW, what can't we currently do with tooltip frames that we will be able to do after your changes?