From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Revisit patch for Bug#11935? Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 20:46:44 +0200 Message-ID: <83inqyjjsb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <661e36f7-2a24-d7f3-f7d2-f1ef98216f5b@cs.ucla.edu> <8337i2l6ns.fsf@gnu.org> <4dc47b62-7cfb-09c9-e036-e11c857c76f3@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1480963608 21636 195.159.176.226 (5 Dec 2016 18:46:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 18:46:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 19:46:44 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cDyHj-00051r-Li for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 19:46:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43894 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDyHn-0001BP-DL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDyHa-0001AK-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:46:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDyHX-0003ds-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:46:34 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49548) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cDyHX-0003dW-3p; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:46:31 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3434 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cDyHV-0002tN-He; Mon, 05 Dec 2016 13:46:30 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:44:23 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210081 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 12:44:23 -0500 > > > If those "optimized out"s are an obstacle we should report them to the GCC > > developers. > > Really? Last I tried -Og they were so pervasive that it seemed very > clearly like a conscious decision on the part of the GCC maintainers. Same here. Let's see how the GCC developers respond to Paul's bug report. > Stefan "using -O0 with most/all checks enabled, all the time" Right.