From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:39:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83inof2zc5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20170202202418.GA2505@acm> <83lgtouxpf.fsf@gnu.org> <20170202215154.GB2505@acm> <83h94bvhzw.fsf@gnu.org> <20170203172952.GC2250@acm> <0a40d539-b7bc-2655-5429-6280022106ee@yandex.ru> <20170204102410.GA2047@acm> <8f9e68fc-4314-625d-b4bf-796c71c91798@yandex.ru> <58A04393.9050207@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486913994 30483 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2017 15:39:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 16:39:43 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwFa-00079G-CD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:39:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52443 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwFf-0007r4-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:39:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEq-0007qr-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEn-0001Ue-HS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47883) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEn-0001UY-Eo; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:53 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3720 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ccwEm-0000ew-JE; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 10:38:53 -0500 In-reply-to: <58A04393.9050207@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:14:27 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212285 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 12:14:27 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > > It makes me rather sad that this discussion does not consider ecological > consequences at all. IIUC it started because of a "(c)" copyright > characters sequence in the comment of some C code. Doesn't it strike > anyone as the ultimate irony to consider this an issue in the context of > copylefted software? I believe this is because we want Emacs to support non-GNU C/C++ source code reasonably well.