From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#21072: Brave new mark-defun (and a testing tool) Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:53:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83innlgh95.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o9ydrzkr.fsf@mbork.pl> <87mvdriuss.fsf@mbork.pl> <87bmu6icea.fsf@mbork.pl> <87wpctgieu.fsf@mbork.pl> <52e67f43-edcf-09e3-5fd6-6079763fd234@yandex.ru> <87tw7wh9sf.fsf@mbork.pl> <87k28sdka6.fsf@jane> <87efyze00g.fsf@jane> <87bmu2eoji.fsf@jane> <87wpcpw61w.fsf@jane> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488905719 31347 195.159.176.226 (7 Mar 2017 16:55:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 21072@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 07 17:55:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1clIO2-00066H-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:54:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51665 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clIO8-0002F1-LB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clINZ-0002Er-Pi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:54:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clINW-0004Of-OT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:54:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39983) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1clINW-0004Ob-Kl; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:54:26 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4087 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1clINV-0000zZ-Pg; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:54:26 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Dmitry Gutov on Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:50:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212819 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:50:33 +0200 > Cc: 21072@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 17.02.2017 10:54, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > +(defun in-emptyish-line-p () > > In case you were wondering, I'm still not sure this is a valuable > addition to our public API. > > But if Eli says it's okay, then it's probably okay. I don't really have an opinion, but perhaps it would be better to make it an internal function for now, indeed.