From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:46:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83indmxwyi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> <34abea95-c7f7-e8fa-8407-8c2fd2a4cfe1@yandex.ru> <83y3mkzw1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv2zzv7z.fsf@gnu.org> <643908a3-bec8-3ac1-38f7-4e73611478ef@yandex.ru> <20171203185946.GC5531@ACM> <20171204155238.GA5101@ACM> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512406073 27730 195.159.176.226 (4 Dec 2017 16:47:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tom@tromey.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, spinuvit@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 04 17:47:49 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtuE-0006sW-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:47:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44073 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLtuL-0001Wg-Ss for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:47:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLttH-0001Uw-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:46:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLttD-0000j7-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:46:47 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:57790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eLttD-0000it-9n; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:46:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4349 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eLttC-0007rV-Aa; Mon, 04 Dec 2017 11:46:43 -0500 In-reply-to: <20171204155238.GA5101@ACM> (message from Alan Mackenzie on Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:52:38 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220707 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 15:52:38 +0000 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , tom@tromey.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, > spinuvit@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Alan Mackenzie > > the "syntax islands" proposal would be a lot of work, which I don't > want to commit to before I see some sort of undertaking to take it > seriously. I hear you. I also think that having concrete problems in hand that cannot be easily solved by the existing framework will help us revisit the "islands" proposal (and perhaps other related proposals) with more "meat" to discuss them, and thus with higher probability of reaching an agreement.