From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: User interaction from multiple threads Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:02:08 +0300 Message-ID: <83in49gycv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <838t59j821.fsf@gnu.org> <5B73DF10.5070200@gmx.at> <87muto5998.fsf@gmx.de> <5B73ED7E.5000102@gmx.at> <87in4b6hwf.fsf@gmx.de> <5B741C4E.6060403@gmx.at> <87efez6b0q.fsf@gmx.de> <871saz5wx8.fsf@gmx.de> <87a7pl1m70.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1534496471 22927 195.159.176.226 (17 Aug 2018 09:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 09:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, michael.albinus@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Elias =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=A5rtenson?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 17 11:01:07 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fqad0-0005rM-DK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 11:01:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaf6-0005Bk-FU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 05:03:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaeF-0005BT-Sr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 05:02:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaeB-0007mf-PS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 05:02:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52511) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaeB-0007m8-Lj; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 05:02:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1857 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fqaeB-0006EC-7R; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 05:02:19 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Elias =?utf-8?Q?M=C3=A5rtenson?= on Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:48:26 +0800) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228632 Archived-At: > From: Elias Mårtenson > Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 15:48:26 +0800 > Cc: martin rudalics , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel > > It is a 15-bit machine with 48 kwords of memory. 2 of those kwords were RAM and the rest ROM. The CPU > was 2 MHz, with a very cumbersome instruction set. > > So yes, I'm pretty sure you could get some incarnation of Emacs running on it. :-) We could probably extend the MS-DOS port of Emacs to do that. After all, what's the difference between 15-bit words and 16-bit words? ;-)