From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Is Elisp really that slow? Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 12:36:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83imu9beyn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20190514235412.kncazq45szlum2gr@Ergus> <83v9yb92c7.fsf@gnu.org> <878sv7sp3r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83r28z8zl9.fsf@gnu.org> <20190515210924.sijzy6mnpgzkt4gm@Ergus> <83ftpecwu1.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516161408.4dov3dwk5h4yoizn@Ergus> <838sv6cmwt.fsf@gnu.org> <20190516202327.5cgy2s4kppy3ahxa@Ergus> <871s0yqg2i.fsf@telefonica.net> <3210C8E9-7A74-47D6-81A0-470948E6D09C@gmail.com> <87r28xq0j1.fsf@telefonica.net> <576240a5-c92a-5cf8-898b-43f214a2b580@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="254555"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 17 11:36:30 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZHx-00143T-Vh for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 11:36:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45242 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZHw-0003X9-VA for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:36:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZHd-0003VW-Si for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZHc-0001OE-1A for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:36:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4745 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hRZHb-0005yn-A1 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2019 05:36:07 -0400 In-reply-to: <576240a5-c92a-5cf8-898b-43f214a2b580@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Fri, 17 May 2019 11:54:50 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:120465 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Fri, 17 May 2019 11:54:50 +0300 > > Vim is consistent. So is Emacs. Inconsistencies in key bindings are rare exceptions in Emacs. Even the tutorial makes the point of explaining the rules for consistent keybindings in basic editing commands.