From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36408: [PATCH] Fix typo in doc string of file-exists-p Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 09:33:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83imsqi5hc.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="93866"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36408@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 08:34:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSc-000OF3-Jq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 08:34:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57216 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSb-0000h4-0W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:34:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSS-0000Zz-Hq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSR-0003ya-HV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSQ-0003xu-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSQ-0003Kj-IO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 06:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36408 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36408-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36408.156170363612800 (code B ref 36408); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 06:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36408) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2019 06:33:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSJ-0003KO-Ri for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:33:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33757) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSH-0003KB-Ua for 36408@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSC-0003iM-MV; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:33:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3476 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hgkSB-0004en-Lf; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:33:48 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:12:32 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:161687 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 02:12:32 +0200 > > Please see the attached small fix, making sure the first line is a > complete sentence. > > - doc: /* Return t if file FILENAME exists (whether or not you > can read it.) > + doc: /* Return t if file FILENAME exists (whether or not you > can read it). AFAIK, this is a long-standing stylistic issue. I'm not sure what people prefer or whether we should insist on consistency in these cases.