From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15420: 24.3; Symbols like =?UTF-8?Q?=F0=9F=9A=B4?= (U+1F6B4) are not displayed by default Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:38:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83imqyqyrp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ftm33xik.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <8736i2iyzz.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="119737"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, 15420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mike FABIAN Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 15 16:40:14 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGvG-000Urt-0n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:40:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42596 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGvE-0004H2-Cc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57396) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGv7-0004Gg-GZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGv4-0007Ap-7d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:40:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43310) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGv4-0007AJ-4F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGv3-00020H-W7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15420.15658799457624 (code B ref 15420); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 14:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2019 14:39:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52131 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGu9-0001yt-DT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44917) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGu8-0001yO-37 for 15420@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGu2-0004Jh-Rz; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2331 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hyGu2-0003fb-A8; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 10:38:58 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Mike FABIAN on Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:25:09 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165099 Archived-At: > From: Mike FABIAN > Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:25:09 +0200 > Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , 15420@debbugs.gnu.org > > For years I did build with my little extra patch on top of git master, > like this: > > commit 258c86a974f788a33a019a082473781a2a603043 > Author: Mike FABIAN > Date: Tue Sep 17 18:41:50 2013 +0200 > > Display some symbols correctly by default > > For example display U+1F6B4 BICYCLIST and Egyptian Hieroglyphs > correctly by default. > > diff --git a/lisp/international/fontset.el b/lisp/international/fontset.el > index 0413646dfb3..bba5c58c79a 100644 > --- a/lisp/international/fontset.el > +++ b/lisp/international/fontset.el > @@ -912,6 +912,10 @@ setup-default-fontset > '("gnu-unifont" . "iso10646-1") nil 'prepend) > (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil > '("mutt-clearlyu" . "iso10646-1") nil 'prepend) > + (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil > + '("Symbola" . "iso10646-1") nil 'prepend) > + (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" nil > + '("Noto Sans Egyptian Hieroglyphs" . "iso10646-1") nil 'prepend) > (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" '(#x20000 . #x2FFFF) > '(nil . "unicode-sip")) > > > But now I tried again with current master without that patch and it > worked. Symbola was used for the bicycles and "Noto Sans Egyption > Hieroglyphs" for the hieroglyph even without my patch. So something > seems to have been fixed. You will see in lisp/international/fontset.el that the #x1F680 -- #x1F6FF block is now configured to use Symbola by default, which is why the BICYCLE and BICYCLIST are displayed without any changes. As for the Egyptian Hieroglyphs, we don't do anything about them, so if you see a change in behavior, that must be due to some changes on your system not directly related to Emacs. In general, the hieroglyphs still require fontset customizations, because most fonts that support them don't explicitly announce that support (and the number of fonts supporting Egyptian Hieroglyphs is very small anyway, and most of them aren't free). In any case, this is not a bug, and I see nothing we can do here to make the situation significantly better. Users who want the hieroglyphs will have to customize their fontset.