From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29420: 26.0; doc of `list-packages' Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:47:28 +0300 Message-ID: <83imofzcof.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zhhx6xsr.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhhv4dfa.fsf@gnu.org> <8336fk24dx.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="240573"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 29420@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 23 18:08:34 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNJBa-0010JD-DV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:08:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40582 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNJBY-00018P-HN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:08:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42893) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIrj-0006jc-11 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIri-0000Sr-00 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54247) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIrh-0000Sj-SZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIrh-00031S-PC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29420 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29420-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29420.157184567711607 (code B ref 29420); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 15:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29420) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2019 15:47:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34835 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIrc-000317-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:47:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33804) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIra-00030v-4Q for 29420@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIrU-0000H0-74; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:47:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2569 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iNIrT-0003N7-IF; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:47:48 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:57:19 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:170074 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:57:19 +0200 > Cc: Drew Adams , 29420@debbugs.gnu.org > > > Maybe use @unnumberedsubsec instead of @section, as having it numbered > > might confuse someone into thinking it's a node. > > I could do that, but I worry that it would make the manual less consistent. I don't see why. The fact that this particular manual didn't yet use that command doesn't mean anything. Try "grep -R" for it in all of doc/ subdirectories, and you will see that other manuals use it (and in general you should look for @unnumbered, as there's a family of these commands). And having @subsection without a @node is also quite rare, isn't it? > If we want to use @unnumberedsubsec more, I'm happy to do the change > though. It's your call. I don't mind using the "normal" combination of @node and @subsection instead, but then it will require some more glue, including submenu etc. I suggested @unnumberedsubsec because it's easier: it requires less work for you. So it's your call ;-)