From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2019 19:39:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83imnvegcp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h83ignrz.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftj2gma8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhhaxalt.fsf@gmail.com> <83bltpgffr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv7gg9oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22kg8pa.fsf@gnu.org> <20191106205133.njij3ve7qqy7yh3q@Ergus> <83ftizg4nr.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ezg2vm.fsf@gnu.org> <83wocbelu1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="9031"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 07 18:40:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iSllG-00029Z-Ks for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 18:39:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46474 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSllF-0008Ut-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:39:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlkc-0008UY-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:39:18 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlka-0004Qv-KU; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1559 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iSlkZ-0000oB-Vw; Thu, 07 Nov 2019 12:39:16 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:00:26 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241945 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 16:00:26 +0000 > Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel , > Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov > > We _can_ do it without renaming, but then flex would be applying > "first-difference" to mean "I, flex, want these parts of the completions > I generate emphasized". Which could lead to confusion when reading > the code. Then how about simply using face aliases, without obsoleting the current ones? > "first-difference" to "completion-emphasis" and > "common-part" to "secondary-emphasis" I think secondary-emphasis is not a good name, it says nothing about its use. We should find a better name. But anyway, this is a very minor issue, the main issue is not how to call the faces.