From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BIKESHED: completion faces Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 18:16:50 +0200 Message-ID: <83imnubax9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zhhaxalt.fsf@gmail.com> <83bltpgffr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv7gg9oz.fsf@gnu.org> <83r22kg8pa.fsf@gnu.org> <20191106205133.njij3ve7qqy7yh3q@Ergus> <83ftizg4nr.fsf@gnu.org> <8336ezg2vm.fsf@gnu.org> <83wocbelu1.fsf@gnu.org> <83imnvegcp.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftizeelw.fsf@gnu.org> <83bltne6oq.fsf@gnu.org> <87lfsrqs63.fsf@gmail.com> <838soqeuzr.fsf@gnu.org> <87ftiyn07t.fsf@gmail.com> <8336eycvpf.fsf@gnu.org> <83pni2bcws.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="36463"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: spacibba@aol.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 08 17:17:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iT6wg-0009Lv-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 17:17:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57114 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iT6wf-0005vS-Et for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59503) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iT6wX-0005v4-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50190) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iT6wW-0001mq-Ux; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:17:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4947 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iT6wW-0000Zg-Bx; Fri, 08 Nov 2019 11:17:00 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= on Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:01:54 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241987 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:01:54 +0000 > Cc: Ergus , emacs-devel , > Stefan Monnier , Dmitry Gutov > > So, using the opportunity that the subject is fresh now, would > you object that 'flex' starts using a new face, say > 'completion-flex-pattern-emphasis' or 'flex-pattern-emphasis' , > that inherits from the current 'completions-first-difference' face? It's possible, though perhaps not optimal. I'd prefer to try to use the same faces, and have their names explain what they do in a sufficiently generalized way which would fit all styles.