From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39424: auto-scrolling Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 20:27:18 +0200 Message-ID: <83imkmgqd5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <573519B4-B7CE-4B10-B892-EA388CF67A5F@univie.ac.at> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="58184"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39424@debbugs.gnu.org To: Konrad Podczeck Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 04 19:28:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2vj-000Ezo-9t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 19:28:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2vh-0006T3-V8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:28:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41844) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2va-0006Sn-QH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:28:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2vZ-0006s0-Rq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2vZ-0006rc-OG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2vZ-0006kJ-KR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39424 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39424-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39424.158084085725902 (code B ref 39424); Tue, 04 Feb 2020 18:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39424) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Feb 2020 18:27:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44757 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2vB-0006ji-GF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:27:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54557) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2v9-0006jW-Vc for 39424@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:27:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2v3-0003tw-Fz; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:27:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3459 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1iz2v2-00036P-Gj; Tue, 04 Feb 2020 13:27:29 -0500 In-reply-to: <573519B4-B7CE-4B10-B892-EA388CF67A5F@univie.ac.at> (message from Konrad Podczeck on Tue, 4 Feb 2020 17:05:06 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:175670 Archived-At: > From: Konrad Podczeck > Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 17:05:06 +0100 > > I observe the following discrepancy between (a) mouse-drag-region and (b) mouse-drag-region-rectangle. > > Concerning (a), as soon as one comes with the mouse below the mode-line of the frame, so that auto-scrolling becomes effective, the cursor jumps to the beginning of the line below the region and that line appears as non-selected during further scrolling. > > As for (b), as usual with other text editors, if one comes with the mouse below the mode-line of the frame, the cursor stays at the beginning or end of the region, and there is no line which appears non-selected. > > I could neither find any explanation for this discrepancy in the manuals, nor a customization option which, for (a), gives the same behavior as in case of (b). mouse-drag-region selects whole lines, so it moves the cursor beyond the end of the last line in the region, to cause the scrolling. I see no problem in either behavior, and don't really understand why there should be any consistency between these two. They do different things.