From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28"
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 18:16:59 +0300
Message-ID: <83imckfims.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <bcae72d9-04b1-8b78-f624-e16ffc450d59@yandex.ru>
 <E1kFWxU-0001Rk-RT@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org>
 <e4c25261-c28b-df1c-6a4b-c1265b9b4b26@yandex.ru>
 <831rjcmgn8.fsf@gnu.org>
 <VI1PR06MB4526626622D66D88227741BE96260@VI1PR06MB4526.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <897b82c2-8ec2-60c0-f5c3-5ab98f79fbd8@yandex.ru>
 <VI1PR06MB4526B986E40AA97F9A70A9E796240@VI1PR06MB4526.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <20200911114013.vnr6k47bnfqbbvkv@Ergus>
 <87o8mc4b65.fsf@gmail.com> <20200911150330.jyo65sauphrswf77@Ergus>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="36008"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, nicola.manca85@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org,
 arthur.miller@live.com, dgutov@yandex.ru, jackkamm@gmail.com,
 drew.adams@oracle.com
To: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 17:18:36 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kGkou-0009GU-GY
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:18:36 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59160 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1kGkot-0003Zq-IC
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:18:35 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41794)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1kGknU-0002MW-Uh
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:17:08 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41065)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kGknT-0005Ky-Hw; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:17:07 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3862 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1kGknP-0000DV-JN; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 11:17:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20200911150330.jyo65sauphrswf77@Ergus> (message from Ergus on
 Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:03:30 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255201
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/255201>

> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:03:30 +0200
> From: Ergus <spacibba@aol.com>
> Cc: Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com>, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
> 	nicola.manca85@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org,
> 	Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru>, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> 	drew.adams@oracle.com
> 
> Also having two "undo" I think is gonna be even more confusing for the
> users.

Why would it be confusing?  We already have several buffer-switching
commands and several commands to show the list of all buffers, and I
didn't hear about any confusion due to that.