From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39149: 27.0.50; describe-buffer-bindings is calling :filter function in wrong buffer Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:28:38 +0200 Message-ID: <83ima6twi1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87361vhjxu.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0umtzv6.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36796"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org, yyoncho@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 15 17:43:46 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1keL7x-0009T7-UH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 17:43:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52524 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keL7w-0002SQ-RP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:43:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46818) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keKti-00089E-UJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keKti-0006aA-G2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKti-00078E-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39149 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 39149-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39149.160545773927404 (code B ref 39149); Sun, 15 Nov 2020 16:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39149) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2020 16:28:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54019 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtf-00077w-AO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46694) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtb-00077g-VG for 39149@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:58 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44245) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtV-0006W3-Vd; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2518 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1keKtU-0005OB-BG; Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:28:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193363 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2020 08:08:18 -0800 > Cc: larsi@gnus.org, yyoncho@gmail.com, 39149@debbugs.gnu.org > > > If adding an argument is deemed not a good idea, how about binding a > > special variable to convey that information to > > describe-buffer-bindings? > > Yes, that could be a third option c). Personally, I like option b) > better. If we need to insert stuff into a buffer, why make it a string and then insert? why not insert directly? The latter means less consing, so less GC.