From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44973: Add a macOS global hotkey function Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 18:18:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83im8vrv2l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874kkw9gmq.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33963"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 44973@debbugs.gnu.org, alan@idiocy.org, larsi@gnus.org, j@mremus.net To: Alan Third Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 21 17:20:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1krNus-0008iz-Kf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 17:20:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krNur-0006Bw-Jw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krNuk-0006Bl-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krNuk-0006Cj-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1krNuk-00060w-EG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44973 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44973-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44973.160856756223055 (code B ref 44973); Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44973) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2020 16:19:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48102 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1krNu6-0005zn-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:19:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43324) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1krNu4-0005zZ-74 for 44973@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:19:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40073) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1krNty-0005xh-8X; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:19:14 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3733 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1krNtx-00082J-LB; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 11:19:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Alan Third on Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:12:04 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:196542 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 08:12:04 +0000 > From: Alan Third > Cc: 44973@debbugs.gnu.org, Lars Ingebrigtsen > > One potential problem with your approach is that we don't accept code > using Objective C blocks as it's incompatible with GCC. Unless that > policy has changed? It hasn't changed, but does this code really need to use that feature? The last time we had a much more grave problem: the system header used for some code itself used ObjC blocks, and thus couldn't be compiled by GCC. It looks like this case is not that problematic?