From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Elisp LSP Server Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 16:13:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83ilxuear1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <16338bdc2497fc51c6fb6d54ab370bfb@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <87ee99dv34.fsf@gmail.com> <07cf50ddddb5a9556aa94201a7ac88c9@webmail.orcon.net.nz> <87fstf3god.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ily2947q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87fst5ae2t.fsf@gmail.com> <87v920j0jx.fsf@fastmail.fm> <839638db-98e1-4669-1b7e-82c8e26ec4aa@yandex.ru> <83ee8jf4vn.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23013"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, joostkremers@fastmail.fm, theophilusx@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 18 15:24:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mcScR-0005nV-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 15:23:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56180 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcScP-0006tB-6z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcSSj-00087n-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcSSi-0005bX-BM; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2951 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mcSSa-00008l-11; Mon, 18 Oct 2021 09:13:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:30 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277281 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: rms@gnu.org, joostkremers@fastmail.fm, theophilusx@gmail.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru > Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:43:30 -0400 > > >> Indeed, it does mean that. An Emacs Lisp LSP server won't help us > >> give Emacs whatever editing features for Emacs Lisp we want. All it > >> would help is adding those features to VScode. > > > > I don't share that conclusion. > > +1 > > In any case, there is no such LSP server and I don't know of anyone who > has even real plans to start working on it any time soon, so this is all > very hypothetical. Yes, as long as this is a theoretical issue, I see no reason to discuss is seriously, let alone have a dispute about it. We can cross that bridge if and when we get to it.