From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unicode confusables and reordering characters considered harmful Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 15:15:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83ilx9idmx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83fssejxf8.fsf@gnu.org> <835ytajsv2.fsf@gnu.org> <11d5fecb44af1d388b7f@heytings.org> <11d5fecb449846dc0851@heytings.org> <11d5fecb443892de13b1@heytings.org> <20211103124119.GB22552@tuxteam.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18119"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 03 14:16:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1miG80-0004S3-Ns for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 14:16:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38816 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miG7z-0002Bd-Qy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:16:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59692) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miG75-0000Is-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:15:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:50364) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miG75-0001qU-JU; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:15:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=fYzrpfaAPcmzw6JTeSXtWk4G+5h2moqcfdxiqQWcI0g=; b=ibDHlrVZv/AA HURzlac3Fj2vYDnecOIxIIBuTjZ8zFfYVN0wVt4bAUaItuVYH8+Jve1lz5pcXOnQ8G/FKWkMzDoF8 X0jOVPx9TIy1xjvh0eAqCTt/47kwMzJFcFj594WFWP3/3kDdfacZ6LNOGcDPZZ9xZ84K9KKqz3Vfu GJW5DDX+pYYIs10VRPUUqEzFP66lnjiK96gLmsnFb8CELFLo4XDQmeTfHGsQkTJKORJjA43WDds49 6G14wq5Y2slscVksAO/hXJTkDYSwF8yXK7C7ZnHRD2i39n8Tfve13UG49nYi6AMxx2udozxyOkiNI x2kMlRz6ckZnto+oIsmqPQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3407 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1miG75-0003DD-4w; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 09:15:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20211103124119.GB22552@tuxteam.de> (tomas@tuxteam.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278573 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:41:19 +0100 > From: > > But you raise an interesting point: in an R to L stretch, is the order > of the arguments also R to L, or L to R? The order of the arguments is always the "logical" order, i.e. the order of increasing buffer positions, because that's how the compiler/interpreter reads the program text.