From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tree-sitter navigation time grows as sqrt(line-number) Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 22:06:58 +0300 Message-ID: <83il8vc9pp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3E82D409-6903-4679-9031-939CA35791FF@gmail.com> <32507689-3b2c-ccbf-dd14-e7bf0bed1ac7@gutov.dev> <6db52945-5459-197c-405d-153ff395a824@gutov.dev> <1F7C956D-6D22-4CC1-8656-6E2A4D07D5FB@gmail.com> <69D18963-D94F-4792-9FF1-159897A99E50@gmail.com> <48CD64C5-CC2A-42C5-8496-33B188497B99@gmail.com> <831qfjg34v.fsf@gnu.org> <32BD183F-2E89-4EF4-B5D5-A3F9FE64178D@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34308"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jdtsmith@gmail.com, dmitry@gutov.dev, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuan Fu , Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 21:08:02 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbn1O-0008j5-4j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 21:08:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbn0z-0002Ih-SC; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbn0r-0002Dz-2y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:07:29 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbn0q-0008FY-5k; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 15:07:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=yXbx3fZa6q7gkeCWXlokPUDZVQAe/XWfqhCaPYzj1cw=; b=QTtE6xOWj5J+CNEwj1S4 sJRv13cMDWAvF5cXJx/ZGl7gADfP87+axBsMbeUXA6hBxnnJ6exSK0DK6lFjK8/nH22EaxQAl9bLA rXC91u6MnIoRnPdDELWFV3wWrP0f/zfp9JAEuRBJCZp7ykeqHuaV7okH0+sKN28Qt+uFDGVIdLL1V q8HuDGCD/zTRuS47kvztWCO9wRTO3wyV2+m67xdg4+avQiVjh3owyWXHIJBaBTcjKCcFa4oADk5Bv uXzd5La5XF1+Cir3IInFgGPYK3dUyFg6thtnJ3EW8dp5U5z+GVoq3Yh8klovz4q6zyCaTfvyXdOWG Ac/kYG9vauXnIA==; In-Reply-To: <32BD183F-2E89-4EF4-B5D5-A3F9FE64178D@gmail.com> (message from Yuan Fu on Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:03:49 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309693 Archived-At: > From: Yuan Fu > Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:03:49 -0700 > Cc: JD Smith , > Dmitry Gutov , > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> I’ve pushed the patch to emacs-29. > > > > Thanks, but why emacs-29? Is this a bugfix? > > The line is a bit blurry for this one, as others have discussed. I pushed to emacs-29 because a while ago you said yes to pushing to emacs-29. Admittedly that was a slightly different patch but the result is the same. Personally I don’t have strong feelings either way. Stefan, WDYT about this? I admit I'm a bit weary, but everyone else seems to think this is a bugfix.