From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: attribute warn_unused_result Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:18:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83hbcialfi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83r5bobz2k.fsf@gnu.org> <4D4B4EEA.50907@cs.ucla.edu> <83hbckb3u4.fsf@gnu.org> <83zkqbah6c.fsf@gnu.org> <4D4C95B8.6010001@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296897549 31925 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2011 09:19:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2011 09:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 05 10:19:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PleIH-0002t7-Jl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 10:19:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PleIG-0004jP-Er for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34318 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PleI8-0004iN-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:18:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PleI6-0000KY-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:18:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:61005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PleI6-0000KT-J8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 04:18:50 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LG500E000HJTH00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:18:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.97.124]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LG500ETA0JBN160@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 05 Feb 2011 11:18:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4D4C95B8.6010001@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135604 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:11:36 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Is there ever a good reason to ignore the return value from > chdir? IMO, only if the chdir is part of handling a fatal error.