From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5493: 23.1.91; Visiting a versioned file while bzr is running signals an error Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:01:20 +0200 Message-ID: <83hbblxuz3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mxzxrsj9.fsf@gnu.org> <83636ksj05.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299089223 23548 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2011 18:07:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 18:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5493@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 02 19:06:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuqRt-0002nK-I2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 19:06:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44132 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuqRs-0006Sc-Lm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:06:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39114 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PuqRl-0006SH-Mm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:06:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuqRk-0000mH-Jf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:06:49 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PuqRk-0000mA-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuqP3-00079I-Qm; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:04:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5493 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5493-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5493.129908901727446 (code B ref 5493); Wed, 02 Mar 2011 18:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5493) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2011 18:03:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuqOf-00078d-5W for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:03:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PuqOd-00078R-Sz for 5493@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:03:36 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LHF00700ZHCFD00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 5493@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:03:23 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.183.216]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LHF006V3ZHMRT90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 02 Mar 2011 20:03:23 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 13:04:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44517 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: 5493@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 23:23:29 -0500 > > > I know what you mean, but I'm having trouble reproducing it right now > for some reason. Maybe recent bzr versions reduced this problem? Right, I don't see it anymore, at least not with "bzr log". "bzr ci" will probably still have this effect, though. > Anyway, a suggestion: maybe there is some file in .bzr/ that indicates > when a lock is held. I don't think so, at least not on Windows: the lock is taken by issuing a system call.