From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
Cc: 9419@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9419: 24.0.50; C-x k deletes the entire frame instead of switching to another buffer
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 12:16:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83hb4m5b3r.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E686868.1030502@gmx.at>
> Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 09:02:00 +0200
> From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
> CC: 9419@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > emacs -Q
> > C-x 5 b foo RET
> >
> > then in the new frame:
> >
> > C-x b bar RET
> > C-x b foo RET
> > C-x k RET (kills the foo buffer and shows bar)
> > C-x k RET (kills the bar buffer and shows *scratch*)
> >
> > My understanding of the intended behavior is that since foo and bar
> > are the only 2 buffers in that frame's buffer list, the frame should
> > be deleted after the last one of them is deleted. But in fact the
> > frame stays alive and shows *scratch*.
> >
> > If I kill the buffers in the reverse order, i.e. bar first and then
> > foo, the frame does get deleted when foo is killed.
>
> I hopefully made these cases consistent now.
Yes, thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-09 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 17:46 bug#9419: 24.0.50; C-x k deletes the entire frame instead of switching to another buffer Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-03 11:01 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-03 11:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-03 13:54 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-03 14:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-03 17:29 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-03 17:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-03 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-04 10:34 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-04 16:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-09-06 13:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-09-08 7:02 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-06 13:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-09-08 7:02 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-08 7:02 ` martin rudalics
2011-09-09 9:16 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83hb4m5b3r.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=9419@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=rudalics@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.