From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9722: list-colors-duplicates does not exclude enough colors on Windows Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:01:09 +0200 Message-ID: <83hb36ui96.fsf@gnu.org> References: <834nzfxqq6.fsf@gnu.org> <83aa8zwoyd.fsf@gnu.org> <837h43wndh.fsf@gnu.org> <83obxeuwa8.fsf@gnu.org> <83k482ut21.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318971732 11735 80.91.229.12 (18 Oct 2011 21:02:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9722@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 23:02:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGnX-00065g-FY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:02:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGnX-00025z-35 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGnU-00025f-1q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGnT-0001Bl-8K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGnT-0001Bh-6o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGoP-0000SU-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9722 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9722-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9722.13189717371706 (code B ref 9722); Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9722) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Oct 2011 21:02:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGnh-0000RT-5E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGGne-0000RF-7i for 9722@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:02:15 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTA00G004ZW9400@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 9722@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:01:08 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTA00GI451W2950@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:01:08 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:03:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52816 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:25:01 +0200 > Cc: 9722@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 19:07, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Anyway, does this fact change the conclusions in any way? > > I don't think so. If anything, it makes checking for ^System a bit > less ad hoc and a bit safer to use. Perhaps add a comment in facemenu.el that mentions where the System* prefix comes from.