From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: glyphless Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:55:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83haxcsgyk.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332698154 2210 80.91.229.3 (25 Mar 2012 17:55:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 17:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 25 19:55:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SBrfV-00030o-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:55:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56340 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBrfU-0002DG-OS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:55:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48358) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBrfS-0002Cs-A1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBrfQ-0002yC-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:55:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:39574) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBrfQ-0002y1-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 13:55:48 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M1G00000CDTUO00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:55:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.240.24]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M1G000B8CGYST40@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 19:55:46 +0200 (IST) X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149213 Archived-At: /* Sub-stretch for type == GLYPHLESS_GLYPH. */ struct { /* Value is an enum of the type glyphless_display_method. */ unsigned method : 2; /* 1 iff this glyph is for a character of no font. */ unsigned for_no_font : 1; /* Length of acronym or hexadecimal code string (at most 8). */ unsigned len : 4; /* Character to display. Actually we need only 22 bits. */ unsigned ch : 22; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< } glyphless; I though Andreas said that using 25 here, so that the entire member fits in 32 bits, would be better (performance-wise, I presume)?