From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12989: 24.3.50; buffer-file-type is not buffer-local Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:21:06 +0200 Message-ID: <83hall791p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87pq32pc52.wl%%xmue@d1.dion.ne.jp> <837gp9zkxu.fsf@gnu.org> <83liax7i9z.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360426921 5102 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2013 16:22:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:22:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: michael.albinus@gmx.de, 12989@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 09 17:22:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DBz-00041g-4O for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:22:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43386 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DBg-0004Km-41 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33784) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DBc-0004KS-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DBZ-0002JW-Sc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:21:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DBZ-0002JK-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:21:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DBi-0001pa-AM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:22:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:22:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12989 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12989-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12989.13604268786980 (code B ref 12989); Sat, 09 Feb 2013 16:22:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12989) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2013 16:21:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46802 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DAy-0001oT-Uo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:21:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:61566) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4DAw-0001oL-EI for 12989@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MHY00H00NYXPG00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 12989@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:21:03 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MHY00HINO33PL10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 18:21:03 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70955 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Michael Albinus , 12989@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2013 09:29:18 -0500 > > > A question for Stefan: should I also remove these from subr.el: > > Not sure. > > > I thought I'd leave them in case some non-bundled code uses them. But > > maybe this is not needed. > > I'll let you judge. If all users just let-bind or setq those vars, > there's no need to keep them around. I'd suggest to remove them, and > if/when someone complains about resulting breakage, we may revisit > this choice. I removed them, thanks for the feedback.