From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14574: prog-prettify-symbols breaks font-locking Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:36:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83hagyt3l9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8338sjusds.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3luv0cz.fsf@yandex.ru> <83ppvmt4ls.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371400690 19160 80.91.229.3 (16 Jun 2013 16:38:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14574@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 16 18:38:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFxx-0006GK-5U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:38:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFxw-0004jD-Qy for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54457) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFxs-0004ig-HZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFxr-0003jE-Ly for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54346) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFxr-0003j9-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFxq-00072o-VH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:38:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14574 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14574-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14574.137140063126984 (code B ref 14574); Sun, 16 Jun 2013 16:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14574) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2013 16:37:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48659 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFx0-000719-69 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:37:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:43932) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1UoFwx-0006zF-QI for 14574@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MOH00I00VF8SH00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 14574@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:36:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MOH00I72VGYS010@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:36:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:75219 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 18:18:03 +0200 > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, 14574@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Why do you think it could do that? > > Because I know nothing about redisplay, and because checking > composition plus some other property sounds like more work than just > checking on composition. OTOH, I don't know what I'm talking about, so > I will be very happy to know that we could add a font-lock specific > composition property alias and not affect performance... The best way is just try it and see.