From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14841: Frames created invisible have their visibility parameter set to t Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:32:54 +0300 Message-ID: <83hafhvnjd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a9ltun54.fsf@gnu.org> <837ggxukjt.fsf@gnu.org> <83hafx3wzz.fsf@gnu.org> <83vc45xuht.fsf@gnu.org> <83li4uv3en.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374820448 15459 80.91.229.3 (26 Jul 2013 06:34:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 14841@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 26 08:34:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bbL-0005wG-NR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:34:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33621 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bbL-0008L7-Aj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bbI-0008L0-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bbH-0002Ly-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bbH-0002Lu-1J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bbG-0004WW-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14841 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14841-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14841.137482040917217 (code B ref 14841); Fri, 26 Jul 2013 06:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14841) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Jul 2013 06:33:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V2bai-0004Ta-R5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:41980) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1V2baf-0004T2-Vu for 14841@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:33:26 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MQJ008005U4DG00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 14841@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:32:59 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MQJ008WA66W4D80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:32:56 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:76672 Archived-At: > From: Juanma Barranquero > Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 02:11:05 +0200 > Cc: 14841@debbugs.gnu.org > > Adding (sit-for 0 t) just before the frame-deletion loop fixes the > issue with your patch, and invisible frames do work as expected. So can we decide that the patch can be committed? Thanks.